Mind games #3: The addiction that passed me by

2016 is the thirtieth anniversary of my computer use. As I was barely 30 when I started using these things I well recall the newness and excitement of personal computers, the learning curve to use a mouse, type an email, work through the text block of the early Internet.

I’m old enough to remember the excitement of not only colour television but colour Internet with pictures and clickable links. The stuff I taught in high school Computing Studies is now ancient history even though it was a solid foundation for understanding that a computer is simply a binary device.

My senior students (hello Year 12 1988-2000) would recall algorithms which are a process or set of rules to be followed in computer and other operations. It was part of my role to teach the kids to write algorithms in pseudocode and as flowcharts, then they’d write their computer programs.

In the years little has changed except for the sophistication of algorithms and of coding. And now, of course, Facebook and other social media algorithms are written with the intention of making us addicted to their platforms.

antoine-geiger-surfake-1622016t164734
Enter a caption

You’ve probably noticed that the sponsored ads that appear in your Facebook and other social media feeds dovetail perfectly with the items you buy online, the FB groups you belong to, the opinions expressed by you or others in your feed.

Branded algorithms create these sponsored feeds, they are specifically designed to ensure that what you see in the sponsored feed is either something you actively support or something that you’ll simply pass by rather than be actively opposed to.

Should you share or like a post/photo or other input, the social media algorithm can personalise the feed further through ads and suggested “friends”aligned more specifically to your tastes. Should you use your Facebook login to sign into a new membership elsewhere online the data inflow to the algorithm is maximised.

Perhaps the sneakiest aspect of Facebook is it’s appeal to the lowest and highest within us all. Facebook suggests connection while it takes you away from real life, it suggests depth when you click Like on a video about abuse and, all the while it collects the data to personalise the experience, it hovers and reminds you of what you had to bring you back again and again and again.

 

 

4 thoughts on “Mind games #3: The addiction that passed me by

  1. Hello Rose
    I just love that picture, a sad but accurate portrait of society’s addiction to electronic devices. I too a have fallen victim to Wastebook, as I like to call it. It’s time I got back on track and gave FB the flick. Great post!

    Like

  2. I too love that picture. I have heavily debated on giving up on face book. I do check it mindlessly, too often. Though not as often as many, it is the mindlessness of it that bothers me. Where as If I carry a book and read a page or two when I have a few moments I am enriched.

    The thing is there is so much group communication on it now, it is a way for my church work for letting people know whats going on and keeping in touch, update large volumes of people and the ability to share photos with family is lovely too. It is literally the only thing that is keeping me on it.

    But it is loud. Smart phones are loud.

    Great post Rose.

    xx

    Like

Thanks for stopping by, I really enjoy hearing from you.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s